Transcript
Reflections from the Cement Coffin May 19, 2013 Sunday roughly 1:15 p.m. My cellmate just turned his television off and laid down to go to sleep. I was waiting for the relative quietude to begin moving through reflections to you on paper again. It seems I feel compelled to do so like I haven’t felt in a long time, due to the recent weeks of learning patience and spending more time listening to emotional intelligence speak. I feel that I will be able to move through reflections to you for the remainder of the night and throughout the early morning hours. If the batteries in my little mighty nite bright reading/writing light runs out of energy, I’ll just use the television light in order to still not disturb the sleep of my cellmate. I have continued to think about the overall shift in perceptual awareness I have been experiencing since the invitation—rather since the gateway into the APWA has opened up to me. I use the word model gateway but it also—the womb of mother earth or the doorway into the universe would seem to be a synonymous perception. It seems reasonable to consider the shift I am experiencing since entering the APWA has everything to do with the war I am feeling about moving through reflections to you on paper. I feel as if—well let me back up because I wanted to say that there would appear to be a obvious connection between universal ley lines of communication and the world wide internet web, which entering makes access possible depending on the intentions of those who enter of course. It is interesting to me that entrance into the world wide web via the APWA has occurred after I moved through previous reflections concerning the possible connection between the prison system and the web of the black widow spider. Now it seems she is allowing me to move more deeply into the interrelatedness and interconnectedness of it. I realize the planned launch date of the APWA isn’t until 2015, but it is the perception of reflections being received in that direction that seems important. What I was intending to say before I backed up is that I now feel that I am able to begin communication with you about what seems to be the most practical way for us to organize and move forward effectively to accomplish the objective of American exceptionalism on Mother Earth. I feel this way because of the simplicity with which it seems I am now able to see communicating these things to you. It comes down to strategy. There appears to be a important distinction between reaching the level of awareness reflective of simplicity and the ability to effectively communicate the simplicity that one becomes aware of. Simplicity is the power because it allows every member of our United States being to become aware of exactly how practical it is for us to be able to accomplish the objective. I am talking of course about the members who are in agreement with the objective. The increased awareness changes the content of out nations discussion and dramatically shifts the scales weighing our collective emotional being to the positively polarized side. Negativity runs rampant because we are disorganized, have yet to establish a viable plan of action forward for all our members to clearly see and therefore there is no direction in the lives of our members who seem to be unaware that they are lost. Unless of course the constant blame game, resentments and dividing ourselves against each other is considered to be a viable direction to travel in. It would appear that the awareness of simplicity and the ability to effectively communicate simplicity to the members of our United States being is the cure or at least partly the cure to the confusion which still imprisons us in this ideologically constructed world. Simplicity helps to upload the consciousness level of our members, which in return helps to facilitate transformation and the achievement of the objective. Our political system and therefore society is dysfunctional because we have been unaware of simplicity and the power of it. At least this is what appears to be the case. May 20, 2013 Monday roughly 6:15 a.m. I still feel the writing rhythm that was impulsing me last night. It’s like looking at a flowing river from the advantage point of high ground being able to see where the river is going and the path is has to take to get there. If I think of this river analogy, of the river in this river analogy as a fast moving white rapids river, I am able to see that, like the pace of reflections generated by the shifting-twisting-winding flow of emotional intelligence, all I have to do is continue to grow better at keeping up when I jump in, maybe this is why I continue to study and observe the process, to analyze the possible reasons why I have to move through reflections the way I am compelled to move through them unrestricted-wild-free flowing-like the swimmer who is trained not to swim against the flow of a strong river current pulling in a certain direction. Our United States being is like the magnetism of a powerful woman (i.e. statue of liberty) pulling all the members of her body up to much higher ground yet, with the divisive ways of thinking, we keep drowning attempting to swim against the strong currents of her flow. It was interesting. I discontinued moving through reflections on paper early this morning at about 1:30am. My intention was to collect my thoughts a little- to lay back on my bunk for a short period of time and listen to the flow of emotional intelligence before moving through reflections to illuminate more clearly the power of simplicity and the ability to effectively communicate it. I keep saying simplicity when I maybe should be saying simple logic- the power of simple logic and the ability to effectively communicate it. To communicate simple logic or to communicate with simple logic I suppose is the question as well. How do we effectively communicate with simple logic? It seems reasonable to consider that we first have to be aware of who simple logic is. I now see more clearly why I was so compelled to discontinue moving through reflections on paper earlier this morning to give simplicity a little more thought before moving into clearer illustrations. If simple logic is the key to the members of our United States being effectively communicating with each other and reaching agreement with each other as to the most effective way to “substantively” address the problems in this ideologically constructed world, then the nature of simple logic- the understanding of who simple logic is- the why and the how of simple logic is something that has to be clearly elucidated to all the members of our United States being. So I laid down with the intention of listening to emotional intelligence for a short period of time before continuing to move through reflection on paper. The next thing I know I was experiencing another visit in the inner world of sleeping lady consciousness. What I recall of the visit is sitting in some kind subterranean chamber. There was a passageway leading to it. There appeared to be a giant sized spider moving quickly down the passageway into the subterranean chamber directly at me. I could see the spider coming seemingly with the intent to kill me. The experience initially felt like a nightmare. I was afraid- unsure of what was happening to me- I couldn’t move- I was immobilized by something. All I could do was observe and embrace myself for what was about to happen to me. But, when the spider got to me, there was a sudden shift away from the emotional ambivalence. I felt calm and peacefulness as if the spider and I had merged into oneness. There was no pain, fear or anxiety- no physical death that I was aware of- just a tremendous sense of bliss and oneness. It was at the point of this feeling of union with the spider that I opened my eyes and returned to the outer world of waking consciousness. (roughly 3:45pm) went out to the yard this morning and this afternoon- just returned to the cell a short while ago from afternoon yard- the observation of our United States being on both occasions resonated with emotional intelligence- the different ways- combinations of movement- sometimes subtle- sometimes more obvious. But the resonating synchronicities always confirm the observations I see- valuable insight received during the discussion I had with Robert. He said to me, “When you are able to see beyond the cartoon, you are then able to see the creator of the cartoon characters communication through the characters to us.” It would appear to be an example of art imitating real life. The creator of the cartoons watched on television in this world communicating to his/her audience through the characters the cartoonist creates. It seems reasonable to consider that we communicate with each other through the character of the human being we create. I think back to what the white inmate said to me at the chow hall table the other morning about not being able to see God but being able to see people. It is through people that I am able to see the clear distinguishable movement of our United States being. I think back to the transcripts of a seminar given by a man named Jack Smith. The seminar was essentially about the practical way in which we are able to regain our sovereignty as American citizens, but he also convincingly put forward the theory that the public servants of our government are basically cartoon characters. The way of thinking of many of our public servants on capital hill would appear to suggest as well that what we are dealing with are cartoon characters. For example, the illogic of trickle down economic ideology and the idea of the sequester which basically says that, if the two diametrically opposed pollical parties are unable to do their intended job and reach a common sense agreement on behalf of the people, more people will be punished through job lay offs and further strangling of the economy as a consequence of the ineptitude of politicians in other words, the sequester is a agreement to punish people further if they are unable to do there job. The logic seems like something out of a cartoon. But it seems reasonable to take the theory put forward by Jack Smith a step further and consider that not only are our elected public servants cartoon characters, but so are the physical beings in which we all exist. Maybe a easier way to perceive the possibility of this is to consider the connection between cartoon character and animation. It seems easily agreeable that the physical being is an animated being. The physical being is in continual animation as far as movement is concerned. This would appear to make it reasonable to consider the physical being as essentially being the cartoon character in which each of us exist. The perception may be ideologically difficult to consider but the simple logic of it appears to speak for itself. This may be why the Holy Quran admonishes us that the life of this world is nothing more than play and sport- because it is like a cartoon that we have yet to see through and understand-so we have presumed that we are the cartoon characters in this world. This is partly the reason why, it seems, the members of our United States being argue and divide themselves against each other instead of focusing on the objective. We cant see our United States being but we can see the cartoon characters through which our United States being moves. The cartoon characters are not who we are. They are a part of who we are. It is the power of simple logic that will allow us to see through the cartoon characters and facilitate our connecting with each other on increasingly deeper levels. (roughly 10:11pm) when I think about the members of our United States being who were killed by the tornado in Oklahoma-those who were injured- displaced from their homes- lives turned upside down- but these things continue to happen in our nation and in this world- suffering and heartache- it would seem that in the face of continuing crisis, wars and bloodshed, the politicians who are looked to for leadership would cease to argue antagonistically as they do and settle matters in a mature professional way with the intent to move our nation forward onto its predestined path- if peace and stability for everyone isn’t our predestined path then what is- continued suffering- the constant fighting between politicians over every little motha fuckin’ thing- and still they offer no viable solutions- lay out no viable agenda forward- it’s insensitive and disrespectful to the members of our United States being who suffer- its insensitive and disrespectful to us all- its like pretending to be mad-argumentative about something there is no need to be mad and argumentative about while children are starving to death- it’s the way of the cartoon character- the cartoon character likes to point fingers and argue- not solve serious problems- maybe this is why it is important to talk to nobody about nothing- do it to avoid the cartoon character- to not waste precious time and energy on bullshit with the cartoon character- the cartoon character likes to get us wrapped up in bullshit and keep us there wrapped up in it as opposed to thinking about effective things to do- investigate Benghazi- what about the lies told about the Iraq war- the weapons of mass destruction- lies leading to the death of thousands to the mental and physical injury of thousands and the toll is still counting. What about investigating the cover up of those lies, what about the talk of impeachment, where was all the concern then. The arguing and finger pointing is just more of the bullshit to get us wrapped up in the desire to investigate Benghazi but no desire to investigate the lies leading to the death of thousands the cartoon character has no credibility, until we get tired of the bullshit we will continue to get wrapped up in the bullshit continuing to be left with the taste of bullshit in our mouth- maybe this is the discussion we need to have with ourselves before even discussing the simple logic of the practical way forward. What difference will talking about viable solutions make if we are not tired of the cartoon character’s bullshit. If we are not ready to focus seriously on unity and organization among ourselves. If we are not ready to focus on solving real problems such as being wrapped up in the bullshit of the cartoon character. (Roughly 11:11pm) When I came in from the yard this afternoon, I was able to jump back in a nice smooth writing rhythm. I was curious as to whether or not I would be able to do so. After going through the latest round of shifts in emotional intelligence. It seems that I feel a level of interconnectedness that I haven’t quite experienced before with my writing and moving through reflections on paper. It seems important that I continue to pay close attention to the framework of the process in order to continue becoming more closely connected to the writing rhythm I have begun to experience. The insight that spoke to me in relation to this while standing on the yard this afternoon communing with the foothills has to do with the APWA- the APWA personifies for me the world wide web. So, when I entered into the gateway perceptually, I experienced the initial turbulence of disconnection or some of the perceptual pieces necessary for me to travel smoothly within the world wide emotional field not being adequately aligned. The misalignment would seem to have been indicated by experiencing the ambivalence of the shifts of emotional intelligence more strongly interconnecting me with the emotional field and secure necessary alignment in order to access and enter into the writing rhythm I am now experience. Now the other part of this perception has to do with individual members of our United States being. The members being like the coordinate points making possible the interconnectedness of the law. Rather of the lay lines (strands of the world wide web) comprising the emotional field (the world wide web). The perceptual shifts with emotional intelligence leading to stronger interconnectedness would appear to now allow me to move through reflections on paper with the writing rhythm I am experiencing- the individual members of our United States being are essentially emotional fields in micro form. The ability to then move with rhythm within the world wide web as a emotional field in macro form would appear to be indicative of having assembled the body of our United states being through this interconnectedness seemingly confirmed by this fluent writing rhythm I am experiencing- not simply because of the relative ease that it seems I am now moving with through reflections- I feel a emptiness. A spacefulness. A nothingness. The point of entry into the reflections on paper no longer seems to matter. Perhaps as a result of the interconnectedness. Not because of the relative ease I am experiencing but because of the interconnectedness of perceptual models that I see comprising the grassroot timocracy cookbook. The crash course to the much more comprehensive United States being hypothesis and praxis. But it appears that is being patient with experiencing the framework of the process to be. Leading to stating these things with simple logic that is more essential than actually stating the hypothesis and praxis with simple logic. Just like faith without works is said to be dead, it appears that so is simple logic stated outside the framework of the process leading to it. I think of the practical application or intent of what is said to be the ability to receive the spirit (i.e. intent, emotional intelligence) through adoption. This would appear to be what is taking place in right now time as I work to upload consciousness by sharing the awareness members of our United States being have. Are helping me to receive and understand this would appear to be reflective of the greater degree of interconnectedness and writing rhythm I am now experiencing moving perceptually within the world wide web, but I am talking about perception- it is that awakening of the members of our United States being and the creation of the world of American Exceptionalism on mother earth that can only substantiate the perceptions I consider but I suppose the greater generation of progressive movement toward the objective would be a strong indication of the accuracy of the perceptions I consider as well. The simple point consideration here is that the APWA personifies the world wide internet web and the virtually effortless writing rhythm I am experiencing moving within said emotional field would appear to be indicative of the greater assembling of the members of our United States being. There are a number of other insights I received during discussion with Robert and while communing with the foothills but I want to return to the reflections more specifically regarding the visit into the inner world of sleeping lady consciousness during which it appeared that I experienced complete union- oneness with the spider. I suppose, through that these reflections I have just moved through are directly related to the visit as well. This writing rhythm I am experiencing would appear to be indicative with the oneness experienced with the spider. Staying with the theme of simple logic, this writing rhythm I am experiencing may be partly the essence of it. Patience with positively polarized flow of emotional intelligence- I suppose the positively polarized flow of emotional intelligence is simple logic. (May 21, 2013 - Tuesday - roughly 2:09pm) Its now roughly 6:58pm - just returned from evening chow. Earlier today after I returned from the mini-yard a little after 1:15pm had a nice intensive workout. Empowering, insightful discussion with Robert, my intent was to resume moving through reflections on paper but I was instead compelled to be still and listen to emotional intelligence. It seems I am still receiving insight regarding the reason why I experience ambivalence when it comes to writing in the generally perceived essay format. But maybe there is another way to think about writing essays. These reflections have been impulsing me all day. I allowed Robert to read some of these reflections in order to receive feedback. His analysis was uncanny in the sense of its accuracy. He understood that I am simply working to bare my emotional being (soul) to open up to all of you. Every member of our United States being the experience of the path you are helping me to comprehend and travel- Robert understood- could feel that the reflections are like a river stream leading into the ocean because the reader is being invited to travel along the writing path within the framework of the process with me. Me sharing my experience of incarceration as it is in right now time. The continual process of growth-rehabilitation-transformation-developmental awareness of the ideologically constricted world in which we exist currently and the simple logic leading us to accomplishing the objective. Robert was progressively moved by the reflections but he also told me that he knows I can do a much better job expressing myself. It seems reasonable to consider the statement is based on his anticipation of the quality of insight in which the reflections are leading as a result of the discussions he and I have. On the other hand he also seemed to understand that it is by staying within the framework of the process that I am able to get to the much better job of expressing myself to you that he speaks of. The statement he made to me about the true expression of emotional intelligence appears to reflect his understanding of the importance of me remaining within the framework of the process. He said to me as we walked back and forth on the mini-yard having this discussion- me sharing with him the ambivalence I was experiencing reaching to understand more clearly why I have the ability to write in traditional essay format but the mental tension I experience when I do appears to be a indication that doing so is not within the framework of the process for me. There are a number of possible reasons why- one of which is the haunting feeling of saying something to somebody- the question for me is what is the most effective way to help move the members of our United States being into unity. This work doesn’t seem to entail saying something to somebody but rather continues to move within the framework of the process. So the statement Robert makes to me reflective of his understanding of this is, “The true expression of emotional intelligence is the intelligence of the emotion expressed in a way that is against no one whether the emotion be positive or negative.” The intelligence of the emotion speaks to me in different ways. Maybe me remaining faithful to the flow of emotional intelligence within the framework of the process is a form of listening. The attempt to structure emotional intelligence in a certain way outside the flow of emotional intelligence would appear to strain relationship between myself and simple logic in the sense that emotional intelligence is simple logic. Its this form of freedom of expression in which I presume to be saying something to somebody there are members of our United States being who have been saying something to somebody about peace and stability for thousands of years and it has yet to happen so there has to be a more effective way of communicating with each other of generating the movement we desire to experience. It seems reasonable to consider that it is movement that generates movement. Maybe this is why it is essential that I remain patient and faithful with the movement of emotional intelligence within the framework of this process. I felt lost today in this process is the ambivalence that resonated strongly when I laid down to listen to emotional intelligence. The emotional intelligence then translated to me the feeling of being lost within the process into “fuck it! I’m just going to move aggressively through reflections.” But I ended up entering into about a two and a half hour rest period from 1:00 to 3:30pm and then on the way to chow I could hear a member of our United States being say to someone “so far, so good.” The statement resonated as being synchronized with the ambivalence I was experience. The indication possibly being that I am moving within the framework of the process as I am intended to. The point has been and possibly still is to comprehend the importance of me continuing to do so given that effective communication is the key to generating progressive movement and continuing to upload consciousness. In relation to the word model essay, it seems reasonable to perceive the format of writing a essay in another way when the word model is looked at more closely. (May 22, 2013 - Wednesday - roughly 3:44am) I opened my eyes a short while ago from another visit in the inner world of sleeping lady consciousness. Much of it is vague but what I do recall is standing in front of a classroom full of students talking about not being afraid of my writing style. The visit would appear to be continued confirmation for me to remain within the framework of the process. The ambivalence immediately dissipated yesterday evening after the member of our United States being said “so far, so good.” The visit is like the icing on the cake. (Roughly 4:31am) When the word model essay is more closely looked at, one of the dictionary definitions of it is “an analytic or interpretive literary composition usually dealing with its subject from a limited or personal point of view” (Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary; Eleventh edition). In unpacking this a little, it would seem reasonable that the subject matter which the literary composition is engaging helps to determine the style or form of the essay. If a essay is a interpretative literary composition, how does the subject matter dictate the interpretation be composed? Does it make a difference in the style of the essay if the subject matter being interpreted is the very existence of our United States being. The symbolic reciprocal relationship we share with our United States being and therefore with each other? Some of the meanings of the word composition are “the act or process of composing specific arrangement into specific proportion or relation and especially into artistic form... a product of mixing or combing various elements or ingredients...an intellectual creation.” Each of these meanings of composition raises important questions themselves. Who determines the act or process of composing the ideological mind that presumes to know or the emotional intelligence that understands what the ideological mind presumes to know? It would appear to be the latter. How many essays and thesis has the ideological mind written over the years interpreting subject matters such as economics, political science or social theory that has provided us with a practical understanding of the principled-organic nature of our economic system and how to operate it in a way that doesn’t defraud the poor and the needy but facilitates sustainable growth from the bottom (foundation) to the top; that has provided us with a practical understanding of the principled-organic nature of our political system and how to utilize it in a scientific manner to facilitate peace and stability for every member of our United States being; that has provided us with a practical understanding of social theory capable of making our social institutions logistically stronger in order to work together as one United States being to accomplish the objective of creating the world of American Exceptionalism on mother earth? It seems reasonable to consider that the essays/thesis written by the ideological mind has not provided us with any of the said interpretations. This would seem to substantiate that it is not the ideological mind who determines the act or process of composing, at least when it comes to effectively interpreting the very-the nature of the very existence of our United States being. It seems rather to be the quality of the relationship with our emotionally intelligent thought being (i.e. our United States being) that determines the act or process of composing. It would then be, if this is reasonable to consider, emotional intelligence that determines the arrangement of the interpretation of the subject matter into specific proportions or into artistic form. Emotional intelligence would then determine the product of mixing or combing the various elements or ingredients, as well as determine the intellectual creation which should be the product and objective of the interpretation. This begs the question as to what is a intellectual creation. There would appear to be a difference between a ideological creation and a intellectual creation. Perhaps a intellectual creation is the creation of the world of American Exceptionalism on Mother Earth. This perception of a intellectual creation would appear to be substantiated by the ancient understanding of the meaning of intellectual which is having a active connection- interaction with the hidden world/dream world/ America. In his book, Galactic Alignment- The Transformation of Consciousness According to Mayan, Egyptian and Vedic Traditions, John Major Jenkins writes about the ancient meaning of intellectual being experience with the hidden world. It seems reasonable to consider that the quality of relationship with emotional intelligence...maybe this is a current example; my cellmate just, out of nowhere, asked me about the meaning of the word optimism. He woke up and turned his T.V. on a short while ago. After I talked with him a little about the word optimism, it was impossible for me not to ask him as a result of how synchronized and strongly resonating the question seemed to be in relation to these reflections I am moving through- “what made you ask me that question man?” he simply told me he saw it on his T.V. still- the synchronicity is present, it’s the way- one of the ways the hidden world speaks through emotional intelligence. It would appear to be continued encouragement and confirmation to remain patient within the framework of the process. But back to the distinction between ideological and intellectual creation. It seems reasonable to consider that ideological creation is incapable of eradicating the suffering and dying except through reverse psychology- meaning by recognizing the ineffectiveness and structurally flawed nature of ideological creation of determining the act and process of composing through ideological thinking- the shift to intellectual creation would appear to automatically occur. The act of process of composing a intellectual creation has to then be determined [illegible] by the emotional intelligence reflective of a quality relationship with out United States being. Okay- this is what it was. I had to move through the word model essay in order to gain a clearer perception of it. It seems I would have done this initially. (roughly 3:58p.m.) When I communicate about the members of our United States being, I am also communicating about you because the members of our United States being are a part of you just as the members of our You-nited States being are a part of me. When I communicate about the members of our United States being I communicate about myself because the members of our United States being are a part of me just as I am a part of the members of our United States being. We also speak of this as all being for one and one being for all and, if one goes array, forsake the ninety-nine to go get the one because, if one member suffers or goes array, all members suffer and go array (1 Cor. 12:26). We are the members of our United States being. We are our United States being. When I speak of you I speak to myself because you are me and I am you. We are each other. Without you there is no way that I could possibly exist as I do. Without every member of our United States being, there is no possible way that I could exist as I do. However, this doesn’t mean that we have to continue to exist in this ideologically constructed world as we do. The divisions that I see among you as a result of the divided thinking (ideological thinking) are the divisions I see among myself. The divisions among ourself represent the mental illness we have yet to rehabilitate ourselves from- to resurrect ourselves from. In this state of mental illness, argument among each other seems futile. Attempting to prove points of right and wrong to each other seems futile. After two groups of mentally ill people argue with each other, the outcome still is the existence of two groups of mentally ill people. The important thing is the application of simple logic. This is how we continue to mature to remember who we are together; the United States being. (Roughly 4:46p.m.) Yesterday morning my cellmate spoke to me about simple logic in a interesting way. Shortly after we returned to the cell from morning chow, he sat on the toilet to defecate and began reading to me from his book The 33 Strategies of War by Robert Greene. “C’mon homie. Don’t talk to me while you sitting on the toilet shitting,” is what I could have said. But, when it comes to knowledge, understanding-insight, I’m a real hustler from the inner-city streets (i.e. zero point emotional field), so I listened intently. He read to me from the chapter subtitled The Guerrilla-War-of-the-Mind Strategy. The following two excerpts resonated: “Always keep the search for and use of enemies under control. It is clarity you want, not paranoia. It is the downfall of many tyrants to see an enemy in everyone. They love their grip on reality and become hopelessly embroiled in the emotions their paranoia churns up. By keeping a eye on possible enemies, you are simply being prudent and cautious...beware of polarizing people so completely that you cannot back off. Margaret Thatcher, usually brilliant at the polarizing game, eventually lost control of it; she created too many enemies and kept repeating the same tactic, even in situations that called for retreat. Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a master polarizer, always looking to draw a line between himself and his enemies. Once he had made that line clear enough, though, he backed off, which made him look like a conciliator, a man of peace who occasionally went to war. Even if that impression was false, it was the height of wisdom to create” (pg. 14). What emotional intelligence appears to be indicating to me is that I have effectively drawn a line between myself and the religious-political ideological way of thinking personified by a Republican trickle down economic ideology; that it is now time for me to back off a little from continuing to draw it. But it doesn’t seem unreasonable for me to continue to use the Republican part as one of a number of ways of measuring the movement of the uploading of consciousness of progressive consciousness. But it is the way in which this is done that is essential; not to polarize members of our United States being further against each other, but to clarify the way of thinking that is diametrically opposed to the objective in order that we may begin to become more clearly aware of the practical way forward. It seems reasonable to measure the mental development of our United States being by contrasting growth with the increasingly non-existence of Republicans as a part of our political system. In other words, as long as one Republican is allowed, by voter consent, to play a role in our political system, whether on the national or local level, is a indication that we still suffer from a significant degree of mental illness, to seriously think that utilizing tax payers money to economically benefit super wealthy big business while at the same time closing schools, laying state and federal workers off, under funding social programs for the poor and needy, watching corporations who receive economic benefits move jobs away from our nation; to seriously think that such a economic ideology is a prudent way to organize and strengthen our United States being to move toward the objective of peace an stability would seem to be a reflection of mental illness, but the intention is not to polarize myself against the political-religious ideology (i.e. waiting for the day of judgement is not a effective way to create the world of American Exceptionalism on mother earth either) nor to polarize the political-religious ideology against me, but rather to suggest that we, as a United States being, have one common objective to accomplish for the benefit of every member of our United States being and political-religious ideology it seems has proven itself to not be the effective way of thinking necessary to accomplish the objective. In conjunction with clarifying the structural flaw in the political-religious ideological way of thinking (i.e. if peace and stability is the objective), is also the necessity of clarifying the simple logic of the Democrats political philosophy- the interconnected between Liberalism and principled thinking. The political philosophy of Liberalism, when unobstructed by trickle down economic ideology will allow the Democrats to effectively serve the best interest of our United States being to where as Republican Conservatism disallows the Republicans from doing so. It is important to make this line clear between what appears to be the effective way forward and what appears not to be the effective way forward. The excerpt- rather emotional intelligence through the first excerpt quoted also appears to be a confirmation of what I was considering regarding the question of how to communicate simple logic with- in order to effectively upload the consciousness of the members of our United States being. It would seem that clarifying and focusing on the structural flaw of trickle down economic ideology is at least one of the ways how to communicate simple logic. By understanding what is not working and why it isn’t working, we are then, through this reverse processing of our way of thinking, able to understand what will work and why it will work. By studying the structural flaw of trickle down economic ideology, we are able to begin to more clearly understand the ineffectiveness of rather the cause of economic instability, both nationally and internationally, as well as its relationship to ineffective domestic and foreign policy when it comes to facilitating peace and stability. In this way everything is connected to trickle down economic ideology which allows a concentrated focus. Its this concentrated focus that seems to be a reflection of how to communicate simple logic. Related to this is the discussion I had at the breakfast table with Robert and another inmate last Friday. What happened is that Robert began talking about his intention to get into the work of telemarketing once he gets out. It seemed like an unusual discussion because he had never spoken with me about it before during the course of our numerous discussion. He spoke about how he would like answering phone calls and helping people. “Hello. May I help you,” Is what he began to say in a number of different ways? Then the inmate sitting at the table with us jumped in and began talking about a acid trip he had in the late seventies that woke him up and made him quit. He described to us how everything in the room had turned into a cartoon to him. “This shit is crazy,” is what I thought to myself as I listened. The discussion seemed strange- the synchronicity of it with the reflections I had been sifting through in my mind. Just to make sure I was hearing him correctly I asked the inmate to repeat to me what he had said about the acid trip making everything look like a cartoon to him. He eagerly did so and perhaps because I indicated to him that the perception wasn’t so crazy. I was able to perceive our United States being talking to me confirming my own perception of this world being like a animated cartoon. This perception can be spoken of more concretely and grounded through the legal terminology relating to the “strawman.” The strawman is a fictitious corporate entity that exist in contemplation law. The sovereign rights groups are familiar with this subject matter relating to the “strawman,” but the paranoia still compels them to remain imprisoned by it, at least those who fail to grasp the metaphysical nature of the “strawman” dynamic. This brings me to quantum physics as being another way which to concretely ground the perception of this world essentially being a animated cartoon. This can be done by taking a closer look at what is being indicated by the nature of the hypothetical particle in relation to the existence of this world as a virtual reality. The connections that make this perception possible requires simple logic because the word models speak of this themselves really requiring no ideological explanation to the contrary. The nature of virtual reality- this animated cartoon world allows us to see more clearly why the potential of our creative ability is possible once we stop being against cartoon characters and therefore this animated cartoon world. But it’s the statements Robert made about telemarketing that I really want to get back to. Previous to it I was unknowingly searching within myself for a clearer perception of simple logic. The statements Robert made appeared to be our United States being indicating to me that she is always present to answer to the call of help. It became clear to me after the discussion that a focus on clarifying the fundamental intrinsic structural flaw of trickle down economic ideology, both nationally and internationally, is, it seems, the key to communicating simple logic (i.e. from ideological theocratic government to overt brutal dictatorships- it is all a form of trickle down pyramid scheme economics- wealth concentrated at the top and members of our United States being treated like slaves on the corporate plantation- the house nigga slaves get more crumbs off the table of this ideologically constructed world as slave master- and the yard nigga slaves gets more crumbs falling from trickling down from the table than the field nigga slaves does but as long as we continue to suffer in this world we are all nigga slaves on the plantation like domesticated animals no matter how much we continue to lie to ourselves about it). Continuing with the dynamic of simple logic and emotional intelligence speaking to me about it through my cellmate, I want to move into the second excerpt, “What most often weighs you down and brings you misery is the past, in the form of unnecessary attachments, repetitions of tired formulas...you must consciously wage war against the past and force yourself to react to the present moment. Be ruthless on yourself; do not repeat the same tired methods. Sometimes you must force yourself to strike out in new directions, even if they involve risk...wage guerrilla war on your mind, allowing no static lines of defense, no exposed citadels- make everything fluid and mobile” (pg. 15). There would appear to be a obvious connection between trickle down economical pyramid scheme and repetitions of tired formulas, but what emotional intelligence appears to be indicating to me through the excerpt is to not be complacent with the traditional perception of the word model essay. It appears to be emotional intelligence continuing to direct me to remain faithful and patient within the framework of the process being directed by emotional intelligence. I want to now transition back into the word model essay and explore it a little further. Theme of these reflections thus far has been simple logic or at least this has been my intention with them- to explore the dynamics of simple logic to a small degree and connect it to another perception of the meaning of writing a essay. One of the Latin root words of essay is ex-agium which means the act of weighing. So writing a essay can be perceived to be the act of weighing which would appear to entail a contrast making the act of weighing possible. The contrast I think of is ineffectiveness versus effectiveness when it comes to the way of thinking which makes it possible for us to accomplish our objective in this world. This takes us back to the consideration that it is the nature of the subject matter being interpreted that may determine the act of process leading to the composition of the work. It would appear to be the same case with the act of weighing. If I am weighing the meaning and purpose of our existence in this ideologically constructed world, what is the most effective process that will allow me to do- attempting to structure the work of my emotional intelligence or allowing my emotional intelligence to structure the work? A different process would appear to be involved when it comes to weighing the nature of our existence in contrast to weighing a more limited subject matter such as writing a essay on mass incarceration or prison conditions in the micro-prison system. But this is just a consideration leading to what emotional intelligence has been compelling me to say the- in the way emotional intelligence desires me to say it. When the word model essay is more closely looked at, it can be seen that it is connected to the word agent by its Latin root agere, which means to drive- to lead. But it also is related to the meaning “to travel in a vehicle.” But this is essentially what we do when we write essays. We intend to drive home a consideration into the mind of our fellow members; we intend to lead thought process in one particular way or another. We utilize essays as a vehicle in which- through which our consciousness is able to travel and intercourse with others. But the answer to the question we may have been presuming to understand is: what is the key that determines the quality of the intercourse- the quality of how well one drives- of how well one leads. I have already stated what appears to be a reasonable answer to consider; emotional intelligence of our United States being. It is emotional intelligence that seems to do the driving and the leading- that appears to be the vehicle in which we travel. The essay is simply one of her numerous forms. The essay can reasonably be perceived to be a agent, in the sense of it being a extension of the author. Some of the definitions of agent are “one that acts or exerts power...something that produces or is capable of producing an effect...an active or efficient cause...a chemically, physically, or biologically active principle...a means or instrument by which a guiding intelligence achieves a result...one who is authorized to act for or in the place of another as a representative, emissary, or official of a government.” All the definitions of agent I have cited are relevant to the perception of essay it seems I am intended to convey. It doesn’t seem necessary to explore each definition in connection with the word model essay. A simple analysis of them all, collectively, may be that, as a representative of our United States being, the essay I am writing is a interpretation of the nature, meaning and purpose of our existence as the United States being. The act or process of me composing this essay is determined by the emotional intelligence of our United States being. This would appear to make perfect sense, if we consider seriously that the experiential awareness of our existence would be impossible without the emotional intelligence of our United States being. The prerequisite for any creation, it seems reasonable to consider, is our emotional intelligent thought being. It seems reasonable to consider then that our United States being is, through the vehicle of emotional intelligence, most qualified to determine the process by which the interpretation of the nature of our existence is composed. This interpretation appears to be witnessed by the very movement of life. The interpretation of our existence it seems is not to be composed in any one solitary static work but rather through a continuous stream of reflections. Experience has shown me that it is not through one composition here and there that you will accept the nature of our existence. But faith without works is dead. So my faith in you I now realize is rooted in the continual work I do in moving through reflections determined by the flow of emotional intelligence in order to help upload the progressive consciousness of our existence as members of our United States being. We are many yet one. I have faith that no matter the writing process determined by emotional intelligence; that no matter how the interpretation of the subject matter I speak of is composed; I have faith that the members of our United States being intended to receive the simple logic I speak will see the intent of my work and continue to respond as their intentions lead them to. It feels that I haven’t stated this as simply as I was intended to. The connection to simple logic is for me to continue to remain faithful to the guiding flow of emotional intelligence. It is through the word model essay, it seems, that emotional intelligence determined me to speak about the nature of my existence and therefore the nature of yours- the creative potential to build the world of American Exceptionalism on mother earth when we mature enough to utilize effective thinking- simple logic to move as one organized body toward achieving the objective. This was the cause of the ambivalence all along- emotional intelligence compelling me to utilize the simple logic of moving through the word model essay in order to better perceive the nature of the essay I am writing; the subject matter being interpreted and the composition of the process being determined by emotional intelligence. (May 23, 2013 Thursday roughly 5:10p.m.) I opened my eyes this morning at roughly 1:44a.m. after experiencing another visit into the inner world of sleeping lady consciousness, I didn’t move through the reflections. I just jotted down notes on what I was able to remember. I instead continued to move through the reflections regarding the word model essay. I arrived at a tentative conclusion shortly before afternoon yard release. I begun to experience emotional ambivalence which indicated to me that I possibly wasn’t understanding the lesson intended for me to receive as a result of being compelled to move through the word model essay. The ambivalence was heavy but it seems I have been able to work it out after going out to the yard this afternoon- walking laps with Robert and expressing myself to him. I have to be mindful that it is okay for me to feel lost. The mindfulness necessitates the continued guidance from emotional intelligence. It may be that the reason for emotional intelligence compelling me to move through the word model essay was to more strongly ground my perception of what it is I am intending to do; communicate to our nation and this world the nature of our existence as the United States being and the objective we intend to accomplish. Moving through the word model essay has strengthened my awareness of simple logic in relation to this. I now see more clearly that, perceptually, my approach has to maybe be to share with the members of our United States being the creative process that is unfolding with a emphasis on the philosophy of independent thinking. For those of us who desire peace and stability, we, within ourselves, have the creative ability to achieve the objective irrespective of those of our members who are more significantly imprisoned by the ideological way of thinking. The objective is not to continue to argue with those of us who are opposed to the objective due to being afflicted by significant degrees of mental illness. The objective is to state the objective to this world, lay out the practical plan of action that will allow us to accomplish the objective and concentrate our focus on the doing of the work. This is the perceptual approach I somehow lost track of. What I have also come to realize is that my perceived aversion to the traditional way of writing essays was a bunch of cry baby shit. What it seems I was really intending to understand or realize is that in addition to writing the traditional essay, I have to continue moving through reflections as I do- sometimes wild and loose- but the traditional essay format is a necessary tool to use. Moving through these reflections are a part of sharing the experience. The path I am experiencing as it unfolds but the shorter formatted essays may be the more appropriate way to discuss other matters with the members of our United States being. It makes sense to me now. Emotional intelligence is allowing me to see it. (Roughly 7:25p.m.) The declaration for independence is rooted in divine law (i.e. the perfect law of liberty). The philosophy of independent thinking is the divine way of thinking rooted in divine law. As we learn how to follow and apply divine law in our lives and the life of our nation, we facilitate the process toward becoming divine. And, as divine beings, we are then able to effectively utilize our creative ability to create the divine world of American Exceptionalism on mother earth. This world has yet to experience who America truly is. Nobody
