I have a unique job.
As the program designer of Take a Load Off (TLO) it’s my job to teach it, train others to teach it, and evaluate the progr effectiveness. Since July 2014, with support from our proactive Reentry Affairs Coordinator Mrs. Guthrie, TLO has provi , standardized curriculum and one-on—one guidance to prisoners for their reentry needs. This required a new work deta "6
24 inmates, called Reentry Technicians, who provide the services: such as applications for vital documents and facilitating: courses in each housing unit. Their class rooms are called the Reentry Opportunity Center (ROC). That's a lot of progres under 5 years, considering TLO started with a ruler and ball point pen on my bed covers. .
Now it’s the back bone of a reentry program.
It shouldn't be surprising that team work between prisoners and Staff members can yield results. Though they are the ’ it exception. It takes time.
Susan Kieffer, Reentry affairs Coordinator at Ray Brook (1) wrote about such a collaborative effort in her introduction to
“Essential Reentry Resource Book”, a book which was the result of the Ray Brook Reentry Initiative. “Thanks to the many currently and previously incarcerated men and women who have contributed their invaluable time and experience to this‘: project. Vlﬁthout their desire for accurate information and unwavering belief in this book, we would not have been challeng to dig deeply, to probe so many resources, to look beyond the readily available answers for true solutions.” Mr. Keiffer wri
“Nor would we have had the motivation or the opportunity to test these ﬁndings and document the results so thoroughly.
The current evaluation of TLO I ROC is simple. Answers this question: how many prisoner are willing to participate and impacts have we made so far? The role of the TLO I ROC program is special in the BOP, since our Unit Based program—.;$A‘..‘..A..s:»;7, the ﬁrst of it kind in the system. Collaborating with Staff was a natural step and adds empirical data about what we do. l‘do.n”t;_- want the program to get undue credit or miss any opportunities to be more effective, just because it’s been described as a}
Best Practice by regional ofﬁcials doesn’t set me at ease. There are plenty of programs out therethat get “results” then falte; because those ﬁndings are inaccurate. We don't need rose tinted glasses, we can change the program as needed.
Even common sense changes like expanding programs and resources to serve an entire population of offenders more effectively needs to be studied.
242 lnmote Shopper » Spring/Summer20l5
Since November we’ve gathered 300 complete surveys, or roughly 20% of the general population in Forrest City medium. The Reentry Affairs Coordinator, Counselors and Case managers have administered course-credit and tracked requests for applications. l’ve also conducted 100 interviews and a case study of the institutions progress
‘ which will be available in a Report in the coming months.
A Summary of ﬁndings: 4'
1. 75.5% had participated in Instructional programs elsewhere, only 3% said they would not voluntarily participate in unit-based reentry programs.
87.3% were concerned with employment after release from prison, but only 49.7% had an institutional job.
73.7% had a GED, only 14.3% had post-secondary education or certiﬁcation in a trade.
45.1% were ﬁrst time offenders, almost all of whom stated that employment concerned them the most, meanwhile, repeat offenders almost unanimously were conﬁdent about a job.
Repeat offenders stated, along with 29.1% of others, that getting their Driver’s License was the biggest barrier.
93.8% had an average of two out of seven vital documents (2/7). Surprisingly 26.2% of these prisoners said they did not need help locating or completing applications one—on-one to receive those documents.
That last one was interesting. Our Survey had plenty of YES I NO questions, such as ‘Do you have a GED, Secondary
Schooling, or Trade Certiﬁcation and Experience’ or ‘ls this your ﬁrst time preparing to reenter society? If not please explain’. But the survey was also designed to measure prisoners current understating of the reentry process and their perceptions of the resources available to them.
There were checks and balances.
A For example: Brian, who has zero of seven (0/7) vital documents recommended for reentry, said “I don’t think I require one-on-one help.” Charlie, had ﬁve of seven (5/7) vital documents, and said “[one-on-one] may be helpful.” What's interesting about those two men you ask, well both men had over 10 years’ experience in trade labor and at least 2
1 years in college. How can one be so different from the other? How can the difference widen so much as the education and life-experience levels decrease with other prisoners?
Well... Results are effected by people’s conﬁrmation bias. Research studies on self-evaluation and positive illusions have found that the worst self—eva|uators are people who lack skills. David Dunning, a renowned researcher called this the “unskilled and unaware" phenomenon (2). This is certainly the case with many prisoners who attend reentry courses but come with an illusory belief that they can overcome unaddressed issues in their lives with sheer will power
—or darkly, being more sneaky next time.
'9 It is a sad fact of human nature.
Inside the evaluation:
A Digging around a table top loaded with surveys, I stopped several times, surprised with a few ﬁndings (possibly suffering a little bias myself). Only 6.1% of inmates expressed a negative or ambivalent attitude towards participating in unit programs. I expected there to be more. Prisoners complain so much I ﬁgured they would just gripe their way
‘ right past the obvious need for Reentry Opportunity Centers.
The majority expressed a positive opinion like ‘Kevin’, who has served time in state prison previously and was
shipped directly to federal prison to serve another sentence for conspiracy charges, ‘‘I think [classes] are a big help to
“everyone” he stated. In an interview with another “positive” participant the sentiment was explained more colorfully but
.. basically the same.
Meanwhile negative opinion had plenty of color to make up for the lack of frequency. Jessie, a repeat offender,
‘answered NO to voluntary participation in our programs, stating ‘‘I’m on my own time”. No less stubborn but more
"ambivalent responses were presented, like this statement from another repeat offender “I am still working on myself and don’t want class... no one can tell me how to stay free.”
Thousands of studies on Psychology indicate that people do better when they have high self-conﬁdence. Psychologist
Albert Bandura and Dale H. Schunk suggest that when building self-efﬁcacy it is best to shrink the behavioral tasks
’ that are required (3). For prisoners, this means offering a class room right in their unit. Imagine if a college was built next door, wouldn't you be tempted to at least wonder through it? Ask some questions? Meet the admissions Ofﬁcer lnmote Shopper >> Spring/Summer 2015 _ 243 just to meet your neighbors?
Oh, look, an interesting course.
Considering that 97% of prisoner in the survey admitted they would voluntary take that tour gives me hope.
As the evaluation is nearing its conclusion plans are being made to improve the program. Informative ﬂiers will be designédj that instruct prisoners on applying for vital documents, about preparing themselves for assistance in the Reentry Opportunity
Center, and leads on employment and postsecondary education available to them.
Based in part by my 11 year experience inside the BOP, and 4 years’ experience as an educator of prisoners, the psychological phenomenon found in U.S. prisons doesn’t get a lot of practical attention. VVhat’s important is that solutions 1 must be backed up with plenty of psychological studies, and be administered professionally. As straight-forward as our approach is -it is radical. Hopefully another study, in about three to ﬁve years, quantiﬁes my greatest hope: a reduction in if L l recidivism among participants.
Darrel, a prisoner included in the survey summed it up pretty good, “The programs are good, they keep your mind working instead of just idling in prison. Thinking and learning is always good." Thanks to participants like him we are‘ now closer to measuring to what extent that good is doing. 1 V '
1. Susan Kieffer, Reentry Affairs Coordinator, Ray Brook, NY, email@example.com, *see “Essential Reentry Resource Book”
2. David Dunning, Chip Heath, and Jerry Suls (2004), “Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace" 6
Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69-106. “
3. Albert Bandura and Dale H. Shcunk, (1981), “Cultivating Competence, Self-Efﬁcacy, and Intrinsic Interest Through proximal Self-
Motivation," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598
50+ ways to make legitimate money in society as an ex—offender. Depend on yourself, make legal money, get off parole and stay free. Even if you are not being released, perhaps you have a loved one struggling on the outside.
Tested and tried ways that work via the Internet or as a startup business. Send $12.00
New Photos! 57+ semi-nude ﬂyers of sexy girls and 40 ﬂyers of nudes. Real photos, printed from a photo lab, not from a) home printer which gives you the best quality. We ran a summer special and we are now keeping the lower prices.
For more information and a sample black & white photo sheet, please send a SASE and specify semi-nude or nude.
Do you want to send candy or a gift basket to your loved ones? We can do your shopping for that someone special.
Please send a SASE for more info.
If you have new 66 cent stamps or new 21 cent stamps, we will purchase them from you. Rates are 45_ cents for 66 cent V stamps and 15 cents for 21 cent stamps. Before sending any forever stamps, please contact us to see if we are buying and- the rate. 1 1
F.O.S. Box «*4-2922, Phoenix, AZ 85080
Everyone needs a Mom they can count on! Sincerely, Moms
If you are working on an APWA-related project, please let us know how you plan to utilize the Archive. We hope to share information about your work with our readers and, whenever possible, with relevant APWA authors.
APWA is an open access archive. We encourage use of the writings for research, course planning, and projects engaged in examination of the criminal legal system. Reproduction of essays in their entirety infringes on author copyright without their explicit consent from the writers. Please contact us if you plan to reproduce entire essays; we will do our best to put you in contact with the authors for consent, and their compensation for any project that is profit making.