Oregon/Louisiana non-unanimous v. unanimous verdicts un-constitutional

Rupert, Bob G.



A.P.N.A Re: Oregon/ Louisiana non-unanimous v. unanimous verdicts *un-constitutional* Recently... the issue of nun-unanimous jury verdicts have become a hot legal topic in Oregon/ Louisiana's, Judicial system. The United States Supreme court is set to make a ruling 10/2019. "Only", two states utilize non-unanimous jury verdicts. Apparently... in *acknowledgement* of a constitutional violation of a very fundamental right. The Louisiana law maker's and the judicial system concede there exist a constitutional violation. The *Louisiana constitutional* in its self... was un-constitutional. This Louisiana constitution has been in effect for "Decades"- its "shocking", that the Louisiana justice system...has "not" come forth decades ago. Legal scholars, ignored this constitutional right violations- this obvious, violation certainly invites the question(s) of their integrity. E.T.C The truth be. that they are constitutional Rts violators- an inescapable fact- as well as irresponsible. And very unfit to be in a position to be charged with responsibility that involved the constitutional rights of American Citizens. The *Swamp* needs Drained of the very top. Constitutional Rts violator(s) should not be insulated from being held accountable. Their actions have caused decades of irreversible…..un-constitutional incarcerations. *illegal incarcerations* absolutely irreversible. The Louisiana ruling send’s a very clear message. the practice is un-constitutional. It essentially, converts *not guilty* juror votes to guilty. Oregon has the very same practice in place. Oregon is soon to be the "only" state that utilizes that practice, all other states require a unanimous jury verdict. (12-0) This is a hot topic in the Oregon Judicial System. There has been major news articles addressing this constitutional issue- the question remains... will... Oregon continue this practice for decades to come ? W/out accountability...its a clear approval of un-constitutional acts demonstrated upon the American citizens- by the very law makers, and the very judicial system entrusted to protect the Constitutional Rts of all. In the 8/27/19 U.S.A Today news paper the Oregon atty Gen- said, before the U.S Supreme ct- the states criminal justice system would be *overwhelmed* if the U.S. supreme court ruled. That non-unanimous jury verdict are un-constitutional. this constitutional rights violation(s) demonstrated upon citizens by the judicial system, have been utilized for years for some *victims* there exist no judicial relief. The courts/ judicial system is a continual proliferation of scams- victimization of tax payers/citizens- the cost of un-constitutional- incarcerations- Astronomical amounts- its the victimization of America- America is brain washed in to being voluntary victims. *consensual*- Do we want a society in which deception by the courts/ judicial system becomes a way of life? We cannot tolerate a society- in which the government courts- judicial system is empowered to conduct every manner of scam at will and w/out accountability- Public defenders are in *moral ruins* attempting to pretend- to safe guard constitutional rts state Bar(s) are fatal to constitutional levels of representations- the state Bar adds instead a second defilement to a sub-constitutional level of representation. The ripple effects are incredible- local law enforcement *know well*... the level of representation afforded by their local pub-def office to indigent defendants- they *guide* certain cases to atty(s) who... mis-lead their client- scam plea deals by mental tactics- in order to promote court room politics.

Author: Rupert, Bob G.

Author Location: Washington

Date: September 13, 2019

Genre: Essay

Extent: 7 pages

If this is your essay and you would like it removed from or changed on this site, refer to our Takedown and Changes policy.

Takedown and Changes Policy
Browse More Essays