Sussex 2 State Prison is a Potemkin prison

Rowe, Uhuru Baraka

Original

Transcript

Sussex 2 State Prison is a Potemkin Prison By Uhuru Baraka Rowe May 27, 2018 How many of you have ever heard of a Potemkin Village? According to Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (11th Edition), a Potemkin Village is "an impressive facade or show designed to hide an undesirable fact or condition." It is named after Grigori Aleksandrovich Potemkin (1739-1791), a Russian field marshal and statesman, who supposedly built impressive fake villages along the route that Catherine II (i.e. Catherine the Great) would often travel. The fake villages served to conceal all of the cruelties and injustices that existed during her reign as Empress of Russia from 1762-1796. I maintain that the same "impressive facade and show" exist to conceal the cruelties and injustices taking place behind the walls of Sussex 2 State Prison (S2SP). The Virginia Department of Corrections (VADOC) endeavors to have all of its prisons accredited by the American Correctional Association (ACA), the nation's largest nonprofit corrections and accreditation agency. According to the ACA, its mission (ugh!) is to provide a "professional organization for all individuals and groups, both public and private, that share a common goal of improving the justice system." (ugh!) In order to become fully accredited by the ACA, a prison must comply with a multitude of ACA Standards set forth in its Standards for Adult Correctional Institutions Manual (www.aca.org). These Standards covers everything from the management and design of prisons, the training and development of prison employees, and the treatment and management of prisoners. These Standards dictate, for example, that "segregation housing units provide living conditions that approximate those of a general population" (ACA Standard 4-4139); that prisoners be provided "three nutritionally adequate, palatable, and attractive meals a day" (ACA Standard 4-4313); that "dietary allowances, as adjusted for age, sex, and activity, should meet or exceed the recommended dietary allowances published by the National Academy of Science" (ACA Standard 4-4316); that prisoners "who need health care beyond the resources available in the facility, as determined by the responsible physician, are transferred under appropriate security provisions to a facility where such care is on call or available 24 hours a day" (ACA Standard 4-4348); that "routine and emergency dental care is provided to each offender under the direction and supervision of a licensed dentist" (ACA Standard 4-4360); that the vacancy rate among the prison staff "does not exceed 10 percent of any 18-month period: so that inmates can have access to all staff, programs, and services (ACA Standards 4-4050, 4-4051, and 4-4052). Attempting to comply with the ACA Standards above and the hundred others contained within its Standards for Adult Correctional Institutions Manual conflicts with S2SP's notorious punishment model and its never-ending quest to save and make money. So it has found a way to gain and maintain its accreditation from the ACA by utilizing the same impressive facade and show Grigori Potemkin used to deceive Catherine the Great. Here's how it is done: Prison authorities at S2SP, as at all other prisons, are given advance notice that ACA auditors and monitors (inspectors) will be arriving at a specific time to check for compliance with its Standards. To ensure it passes inspection, prison officials utilize a sophisticated form of manipulation to convince prisoners that it's actually in their best interest to aid and assist the prison authorities in covering up and concealing their (the prisoner's) own abuse, mistreatment, and neglect. Thus, in the weeks leading up to the inspection, it is quite common to see incarcerated workers enthusiastically GI-ing the prison. Vents are dusted. Floors are scrubbed and waxed. Walls are painted. Flowers are planted. Grass is trimmed. The food is cooked and prepared with a little extra care. Prison employees suddenly become nice and respectful towards prisoners in the days leading up to the inspection. This is done to soften us prisoners up so we'll be less inclined to give ACA inspectors a bad report. Placing the entire prison on lockdown, so contact between ACA inspectors and prisoners is minimized, also serves this same function. The prison and other top brass then put on an impressive show by parading the inspectors around the prison on a predetermined route so they can see the newly painted walls, the neatly trimmed grass, the waxed floors, the colorful flowers, the "attractive" food, the "nice" and "respectful" employees, and their well-mannered and well-behaved prisoners trapped behind the cell doors. Impressed by the facade and show, accreditation is achieved. When the inspectors leave, however, the facade is removed, the show comes to an end, and it's back to business as usual; back to treating us prisoners in a degrading and dehumanizing manner and subjecting us to conditions that are harsh, cruel, and overly oppressive. When it's time for the next inspection, the facade is erected and the show resumes once again. What are we to do when trapped behind an impressive facade and show which hides the abuse, the suffering, the darkness, the despair, the tears, the deaths, the bloodshed? Who can hear us screaming and pleading for help from behind these thick slabs of concrete and steel? Amidst the groans, the agony, the sighs and teary eyes, incarcerated Freedom Fighters bow our heads, pick up our pens, and write; hoping that you, The People, will see and hear the Truth. Uhuru Baraka Rowe,

Author: Rowe, Uhuru Baraka

Author Location: Virginia

Date: May 27, 2018

Genre: Essay

Extent: 4 pages

If this is your essay and you would like it removed from or changed on this site, refer to our Takedown and Changes policy.

Takedown and Changes Policy
Browse More Essays