THE TAXPAYER'S BURDEN
I am a prisoner housed at the Illinois Department Of Corrections
Prison located in Pinckneyville Illinois. If the reader
was to punch up this prison on the State website one would find
that the current rate of incarceration is at $18,355.00 per one
year of my living in prison. This is down from the $30,000.00
price tag that was in place in the early days of the 2000's.
One would ask why is is getting cheaper? The budget cuts in the
prison system due to the budget crisis in Illinois is the answer
to that query posed. Still at an average of the new amount of
$18,355.00 a year I have cost the Illinois Taxpayer $385,455.00
for my twenty-one years of imprisonment. I have seventeen more
years to remain locked down. The total cost will he a whopping
688,312.50 dollars to keep me in an Illinois Prison.
The get tough on crime rhetoric, used by politicians to scare
the public in to placing them in office,has built a system of
prison warehouses in Illinois the budget can not support. The
stripping of the budget only makes a meaner criminal, with no
rehabilitation, to be released in to the public. The get tough
on prisoners mindset,of former Governor Ryan's Director of Prison
Administration, Donald Synder,has stripped out all programs that
generated money back in to the prison budget. A point to note
is that Donald Snyder was a thief and so was Governor Ryan. Both
are serving prison terms for the pay to play prosecution they
faced at the end of their terms of public serve in Illinois.
Still not one prison administrator in office to this day
has been able to think outside the box and change the policies
I THE TAPAYER'S BURDEN-Rocky Harris-2
{ t
put in place that stripped the prison system from generating
money hack in to it's own budget. Director Snyder got on the
radio and television preaching the prisoners in Illinois were
being pampered like babies. This rhetoric allowed him to strip
all the programs that generated money by sales of products to
the convict population. The Jaycee’s Programs sold pizza's,ice
cream,sandwhiches,clothes,sodas,and other produces to the men
that keep their noses clean and out of trouble. In the 2B prisons
in Illinois this generated millions in revenue that went back
in to the prison budget, thus off-setting the heavy responsibility
placed on the taxpayer to support the prison budget. Director
Snyder removed the Daycae's Program in July of 1997. Just think
of the millions of dollars lost. These dollars could have been
in the prison budget over the last twelve years. The money taken
from these programs could have resulted in millions spent on
Illinois Schools, rebuilding bridges,health care,ect„,
Snyder placed a punitive policy of locking the men in a
cell all day. He restricted the amount of property each man could
have, he restricted the amount of food and clothing the prisoner
could buy and have in his cell. This caused the money generated
by commissary sales to plummet. Again millions of dollar that
could have been generated to pay the salary of the State workers
has been lost over the past twelve years. This is money the taxpayer
had to replace. The public must now ask itself a few questions
here. Do I want the prisoners to have a few more priviledges
that will generate money back in to the prison budget? Dr do
THE TAXPAYER'S BURDEN-Rocky Harris-3
f. *
I want the punitive nolicies to stay in place? As the taxpayer
it is your money and your choice here. The public officials
need to hear your opinion on these issues.
Would the change in prison policies in place generate more
capital to off-set the cost of prison personnel? Yes, because
the Inmate Benifit Fund,generated by the write-toup on commissary
sales to prisoners,currently pays the commissary civilian markers
wages. Sixty percent of the funds brought about by sales of
food,clothing,cosmetics,and electrical items such as television,
radios,type-writers,ect.? is used to pay the wages of the personnel
in these prison positions. Thus the taxpayer is not burdened
with their salary. If the 5 item limit on electric permit items
was lifted the prisoner could buy and own a television,radio,electric
razor,fan,hot pot,watch,calculator,hair trimmers. This is money
generated in sales. This Is money put back in to the budget.
Director Snyder placed the 5 item limit to make the prisoner
have less property as a punitive punishment. The man has bit
his nose off to spite his face with thesis® policy in effect.
Snyder placed new rules in to effect restricting the property
allowed in the cell. By placing restrictions ."like this he cut
the commissary sales down greatly.
Two property boxes were issued to the prison population.
All your prooerty must fit in these box. Only a feu cosmetic
items,a towel and wash rag are allowed to ha placed on the shelves
in the cell. No food items or books are allowed to be left on
the shelves in the cell. Thus the limits on commissary puchases
and storage rules are punitive and stop money from being made
THE TAXPAYER’S 8URDEN-Rocky Harris-A
to off-set the cost of the prison budget. Men can only buy commissary
they can fit in to their box. Therefore sales are limited to what
a-prisoner must---fit in to his property box. If the men were
allowed to place their commissary purchases on the shelves,
in plain view for the officers, then the men would buy more
food and generate more funds to return to the prison budget
in place.
Why would the men spend more money one might ask? The dietary
budget has been slashed by over seven million dollars since
2003. Governor Blagojevich got in to bed with Archer Daniel
Midland soy bean company. In his pay to play schemes he took
all the beef and pork out of the budget replacing it with the
poison ADM sells to the prison system at a profit of millions
of dollars a year. This diet has major detrimental effects on
the Illinois prisoners health. The soy protein mixed with poultry
scraps makes up the meat substitute fed to the population. The
men do not want to eat the meals served to save money. The men
go to the chow hall each day and must decide to eat and get
sick, or starve. Therefore commissasry sales it at an all time
high. If the punitive sales and storage restrictions were lirted
then money to pay wages would surely double. The men are sick
with permanent damage and sueing. Aqain-*-the taxpayer will pay
the bill in these costly lawsuit brought over the diet in place.
For more on this log on to wuw.siteground217.com/-usstonap/index.php.
or go to the Federal Court site in the Illinois Central District
and review Harris et al.v. Brown at al. 3:07-cv-03225 with the
THE TAXPAYER'S BURDEN-Rocky Harris-5
j *
lawsuit filed in Springfield Illinois.
Another thing the taxpayer should know about. The farms
owned by the Illinois Department Of Corrections are idle. Mo
cattle,pigs,or chicken are raised in these farms anymore. The
meat substitute is bought from ADM at a very high cost to the
taxpayer in fees by bulk and lawsuits for damage brought by
soy consumption. Why should this be changed the taxpayer must
ask? If the farms were brought back to life at Menard,Pontiac,
Stateville,and Vandalia,meat could be raised and fed to the
population of the prisons at no cost to the taxpayer. The sales
of excess beef,pork ,and chicken raised could be sold off to
pay the salaries of the Stats Prison employees. Tt is a no loss
situation here. When the farms are brought back to life you
have a very positive aspect of prison life.
1 . The meat fed to the prison population will be grass fed beef
at no cost to the taxpayer. The chickens and pork can be raised
also on pasture and with little overhead.
2. The prisoners will be given jobs raising the animals, thus
learning a job skill. They will understand how to work a job,
receive a wage each month, and learn to become a productive
citizen upon release by having job skills and in house training.
3. Once the farms are up and running on a profit the extra meat
can be sold on the market at reasonable rates to off-set the
prison budget. It is a win-win situation here.
Once the farms are in place vegetable could be raised,harvested
by the prisoners, and feed to the population reducing the need
to buy vegetables in cans. Thus the budget is cut again by farm
THE TAXPAYER’S BLIRDEM-Rocky Harris-6
raised product that are raised with no cost. The prisonar wages
could be paid from the Inmate Ben&fii* Fund and the sales of
the excess vegetables raised. All could be sold at a fair market
price as not to underbid the free market venders, iiie have young
men locked in cells each day just praying for a chance to join
in programs like this. To be given a purpose in their time behind
bars. The taxpayer must review these issues and decide if it
wants to support the punitive punishment system in place, or
demand changes that will generate millions in savings and revenue
to be placed back in to the prison budget.
I have 21 years in this box. I know these changes could
recover millions in the cost of the prison budget. Create jobs
that teach skills, and most important relieve the taxpayers
expense in the prison system in place in Illinois. You, the
taxpayer must voice your opinion here. It is your tax dollars
at steak here people. Demand better of your dollars taken from
your check each week. It is a win-win situation here.
Rocky Harris