What would Roger say now?

Jonas, W. James, III

Original

Transcript

66834-3800 William J Jonas III 66834380 / FCI Gilmer PO BOX -6000 Glenville, WV 26351-6000 United States September 24, 2019 What would Roger say now? "Do you think anyone will care that my indictment, prosecutors, and FBI Task Force are driven by a Democrat political agenda?" "I don't know, let me think about it." That was my last conversation with Roger Stone, it was May 2017, and the indictment was mine. The month before, I had hosted a book signing and Netflix event for Roger, a friend since Reagan v. Ford 1976. The Roger Stone event allowed me to show off my recently repaired home/office that an FBI SWAT team "redecorated" in February 2016. Cameras were recording as the machine gun toting black clad FBI SWAT team used battering rams to demolish the glass entrance of my San Antonio home/office at 6:02am (February 4, 2016) where my wife and I were sleeping with our puppies. That method of serving an arrest warrant made clear that a failed Obama FBI Task Force was trying to score a political win with a false narrative of "slick Republican swindles poor Hispanics." What the national media has partially reported happening to our President (including when he was President-elect and a candidate), Roger Stone, and others was not new conduct for a Department of Justice all the way down to the San Antonio Field Office. An FBI Task Force had been formed by the Obama Administration to focus on public corruption "No Matter How Small" (i.e., no interest in Obama's corrupt political allies in New York, Baltimore, Chicago, and Los Angeles), and with little to brag about and time running out for the San Antonio FBI Field Office, I was the perfect bad guy (a Republican lawyer/lobbyist) working in a small Hispanic Southwest Texas town that was the home of La Raza Unida, Crystal City, Texas. My prosecutor, Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) Harry J. Hulings was posturing, in 2014-2016, to be the next United States Attorney for Western Texas, and his local liberal media was validating my status as a Republican out of place working in Crystal City. With Donald Trump's election, a liberal, like Hulings, would never be appointed U.S. Attorney, so while still prosecuting me, he began organizing his campaign, as a Democrat, for U.S. Congress (Texas 23) representing Crystal City. As my trial and his campaign kick-off approached, my negative press included references to President Trump and Roger Stone (see San Antonio Express-News, January 19, 2017, page 2 by Gilbert Garcia). USA v. Jonas (DR16 CR135(1)) ended with a guilty verdict after Hulings used various liberal Democrat witnesses and an FBI informant facing bribery charges involving amount more than twenty times in excess of the amounts in the Jonas allegations. Days after assuring Jonas would be denied pre-sentencing bond (August 3, 2017), Hulings, with the support of the Castro brothers (HUD Secretary and U.S. Congressman), publicly announced his Democrat Congressional Campaign (that had been on-going for almost a year). I was a contractor to the City of Crystal City with a written, approved by Council, and published in the media, professional services contract, yet I am, also, a white Republican disliked by the media (the Washington Post "magically" took interest of me in February 2016); my prison sentence is 35 years. Political bias at the Department of Justice creates carnage. The conduct at the "top" was also happening in the field. The political agenda of Obama's Justice Department had multiple manifestations in USA v. Jonas. Some are referenced in various motions and notes archived at www.PrisonsFoundation.org (goto Jonas Anthology 2018 by William James Jonas III and see page 98 where USA v. Jonas the Reason to Review begins). What would Roger say now?

Author: Jonas, W. James, III

Author Location: West Virginia

Date: September 24, 2019

Genre: Essay

Extent: 1 pages

If this is your essay and you would like it removed from or changed on this site, refer to our Takedown and Changes policy.